Never knew this site existed. Just saved me for alot of writing fourth and back with this girl. Apparently the same girl i'm writing to now.
I've got 3 letters so far, none of them asking for money, and was wondering if you would like me to keep writing and get proof for money letter?
Oh. And by the way. You will find the same email under a post on www.indublin.com under classifieds. Just so you all know. email@example.com
anonymous from United States
What IP address was used by this person to you?
anonymous from Hanover, Germany
If you wrote an article about life we'd all reach enmnthgeilent.
about a lot about human psychology and rgiuelois mindset. Though liberals say they're secular, if you ever listen to NPR or BBC or attended liberal gatherings, there is an air of sanctimony--seriousness, commitment to justice and truth, dignity, etc. It's almost like being inside a church. But COMMITMENT to truth is more about emotions than actual truth; also, social 'truth' is defined in terms of a set of values and goals. Since 'gay is good' is one of the great truths of modern liberalism, the commitment to truth in this case wasn't skepticism about the 'gay girl in damascus' but the nobility--hers and ours--in fighting the good fight. In fact, the liberal 'commitment to truth' can be seen in the hoary mythology of MLK as perfect saint, the cult around Stephen J. Gould, the 'compelling' lifestory of Obama, etc. There's also the Magic Negro icon, a favorite of conservatives too. The complex race history is reduced to Ali-as-hero, a bogus story about Rosa Parks 'just happening to sit on the bus that day'--when it was all pre-planned, and TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD and MISSISSIPPI BURNING. And WWII has been simplified into the 'good war'. And the Hollywood Ten, we've been told were perfectly innocent American patriots hounded by 'paranoids' without a shred of evidence. So much for 'truth'. The psychology of the willingness of liberals to believe in this 'gay girl' story isn't much different than the psychology of people who claim to see miracles, like image of Jesus on a toast. A mind calibrated to be sanctimonious in one way will readily accept anything that adds to the warm glow. Though this guy is a real putz, in some ways, he did what St. Paul did. Paul took a story about some Jewish reformer who got killed and spun a whole new fantasy around it. And boy, did it ever take off. So, what we witnessed was, on one level, a hoax. But on another level, it was a new myth in the making. He created his own Anne Frank(who has become the Virgin Mary figure of Holocaustianity). And he has good company. Lillian Hellman created a totally bogus story about some woman named Julia who supposedly saved Jews and worked for the German underground but was killed by Nazi goons and disappeared. It became a big best seller and was made into a movie, and as a child, I saw it on PBS many times and wept and wept. Then later, I read Paul Johnson's chapter on Hellman in INTELLECTUALS.. and did I feel like donkeyheaded fool. http://nibjgg.com [url= http://wdzmjsuw.com..jsuw[/url] [link= http://hvkfoaxnjcp...jcp[/link]